Three ways to work together.

I review your docs architecture, content, structure, and tooling. You get a prioritized findings memo showing what's working, what's broken, and what to fix first, with quick wins at the top.

This is usually the lowest-risk way to understand whether the problem is really documentation, or whether the docs are exposing a deeper workflow, ownership, or migration issue.

What you get:

• +Docs architecture and navigation review
• +Content gap and trust-risk analysis
• +Prioritized action list, quick wins first
• +Automated baseline plus manual review
• +Written findings memo and optional Loom walkthrough

Best for: teams that know something is wrong but are not sure where to start.

Want a quick read before committing? Run a free automated diagnostic at docs-score.com, the same baseline I use to start every audit.

For teams whose problem is bigger than documentation. Tool sprawl, undocumented integrations, workflow risk, migration uncertainty, or a technical system nobody fully understands.

I review the tools and workflows, gather context async, and deliver a findings memo: what you have, what overlaps, what is undocumented, where the risk is, and what to do next in priority order.

Good for:

• +Ops and IT leads who need a clean inventory before they can make a decision
• +Engineering teams inheriting systems they did not build
• +Companies preparing for a migration, cleanup, or tooling decision

Pricing depends on scope. Most assessments land between $2,000 and $5,000.

Start a conversation

Compare the options